Solar energy programs california

Please enable scripts and reload this page. Turn on more accessible mode. Turn off more accessible mode. Skip Ribbon Commands. Skip to main content. Turn off Animations. Turn on Animations. Low-Income Weatherization Program. It looks like your browser does not have JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript and try again.

The new policy would reduce payments granted to solar customers for the excess power they generate — a policy known as net-energy metering — and also add monthly charges for customers. These changes would apply to new customers as well as consumers and businesses who already have rooftop panels. Solar adopters have traditionally been wealthier consumers, given the high up-front cost of installing a solar system, and the state's utility companies have long argued that other customers are unfairly subsidizing grid costs for these solar customers.

In the page document, the regulatory body said that the current net-energy metering policy "disproportionately harms low-income ratepayers. Southern California Edison, one of the state's largest utility companies, said the proposed decision is a "meaningful step toward modernizing California's rooftop solar program.

But solar companies and advocacy groups were quick to sound the alarm. California has the highest number of residential solar customers across the U. For people in the industry, the message is clear: the best time to go solar was five years ago, the next best time is now.

Energy Pal Start Now. Background But what is a Net Metering Agreement, and why does it matter? California NEM 3. Support For NEM 3. Controversy This proposed change has therefore generated a lot of protests from solar advocates. There is a clean energy shortfall in the evening hours when the sun is down, which forces California to rely on fossil fuels to meet evening demand. One solution to the problem is distributed storage, but the current NEM program lacks the price signals necessary to incent storage adoption, thus less than 10 percent of existing NEM customers have paired storage with their solar systems.

All ratepayers pay as much as 10 times more for exported NEM energy than for other sources of renewable energy. An independent third-party evaluation of NEM 2. Under NEM 2. Ratepayers without NEM systems, who are disproportionately low-income, pay significantly higher electricity rates due to NEM. Without NEM reform, these amounts will increase substantially by